professor analysis data from beginning of industial age and switches his position, stating now that anthropogenic global warming is real. his data has not been peer reviewed. nor does he mention the cyclicality of global warming and cooling
If one reads the article carefully, one can see that assuming their projection is caused by human activity, or in the parlance called anthropogenic.
You would think after 20 years of assertions, someone would come up with a peer reviewed article supporting the notion that CO2 is caused by human intervention. VERY MISLEADING ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL WHACKOS.
If one reads the article carefully, one can see that assuming their projection is caused by human activity, or in the parlance called anthropogenic.
You would think after 20 years of assertions, someone would come up with a peer reviewed article supporting the notion that CO2 is caused by human intervention. VERY MISLEADING ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL WHACKOS.
