Man-made global warming can't be proven
there are no peer reviewed studies to prove anthropogenic warming
there are more than a dozen peer reviewed studies that show the variability of the sun is the culprit
GLOBAL WARMING - NOBEL LAUREATE BLAMES ANTHROPOGENICS
Global Warming: Nobel Prize-Winner Mario Molina Links Recent Extreme Weather With Man-Made Climate Change
I LOVE ARTICLEs LIKE THIS. THIS NOBEL CHEMIST ACTIVIST STATES BELOW: "They are now more clearly connected to human activities, such as the release of carbon dioxide ― the main greenhouse gas ― from burning coal and other fossil fuels."
HE DOES NOT KNOW THAT co2 levels are lower today than 20 years ago. Nor does he cite any scientific finding to support his claim. typical bullshit.
Ancient Tech Helped People Survive Global Warming
NOTE THE LEAD OFF SENTENCE: "FIRST HUMAN-CAUSED GLOBQAL WARMING EVENT." JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF A DOPEY JOURNALIST, WHO HAS TO WRITE A PAPER ON A SUBJECT HE KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT.
MOST AGW ACTIVISTs WILL NOT ADMIT TO THE CYCLICAL EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING/COOLING. TWO RECENT STUDIES, BOTH PEER REVIEWED, BOTH LIKELY TO RECEIVE NOBEL PRIZES IF THE POLITICS DO NOT GET IN THE WAY; BOTH REVEAL THAT THE VARIABILITY OF THE SUN IS THE PRINCIPLE OVERARCHING CAUSE OF GLOBAL WARMING/COOLING.
While people today are living through the first human-caused global warming event, we aren’t the first to ever live through climate change. For example, between the years 800 and 1400, the world was about 0.2 degrees Fahrenheit (0.1 degrees Celsius) warmer than the average for that millennium.
« Previous page |
Displaying entries 145-147 of 158 |
Next page »
Meta
